I got delighted to read your reply. I write to share experiences, and if anyone can benefit from those experiences - well, that is the purpose and what motivates me to write:) Thank you!

Your theory makes perfect sense to me. An organization has a problem, and you try to solve the problem. As you fix the obstacle, you try to see patterns of how we fixed it. Then you try to replicate the same way to solve similar issues hoping that you can institutionalize the solution. Or using the Cynefin model to move the problem from the complex or complicated domain to the simple, where you can have step-by-step instruction.

I believe it is tough to write generic frameworks. They quickly become too general to provide direction - like "build great teams." The opposite is when it becomes too specific and eliminates too many factors, like "have 7-9 team members to have a great team".

Following your logic, we can only use the framework to solve the same original problem. Makes sense.

Thanks for sharing those links. I will have a look!